Judgments

Statement of attorney of defendant lacked fulfillment regarding prerequisites of gift

Punishment provided for the alleged offence was upto 14 years, disentitles the accused of bail

Non-sending of pistol to expert was an omission on the part of I.O and was not fatal to the prosecution case

Loss suffer by petitioners could not be determined by the Court in its constitutional jurisdiction

Omission to examine a witness would not discredit the account given by other eyewitnesses

Section 384-4 PPC carried maximum punishment of seven years and did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497 Cr.P.C

Kalshnikov and detonator were not sent to the Expert for examination and police search was in violation of S.103 Cr.P.C

Huge quantity of hashish could not be expected to have been planted on accused in absence of any ill-will or animosity