Judgments

Malik Mehboob V. Nazar Muhammad and 3 others,

CLC 2013 1865

Muhammad Saddique and others V. Secretary Forest through Executive Officer, Lasbella at Uthal and others,

CLC 2013 1902

Muhammad Arif and another V. Yar Muhammad,

CLC 2013 1757

Nasir Ali V. Government of Balochistan through Secretary Board of Revenue and 2 others,

YLR 2013 2500

Syed Shahbuddin V. Haji Abdul Ghani and 5 others,

YLR 2013 1955

Dr. Abdul Raziq and 2 others V. Mst. Hameeda Begum and 5 others,

MLD 2013 1482

Hamid Ali v. Mst. Farzana,

S. 17 CPC, Section 11, C.P.C. was applicable to the proceedings under West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964.

YLR 2013 1469

Haji Wahid Bakhsh V. Ahmed and 2 others,

MLD 2013 1039

Inam Khan and others V. Haji Abdul Rehman and others,

CLC 2013 1261

Noor Ahmed V. The State,

PCrLJ 2013 1452

Mst. Alam Jan & others. v. Bibi Zainab & Others.,

Art. 64 Qanun-e-Shahdat Order, 1984 Specific Relief Act Ss.39, 42 & 54. In his local certificate, identity card and the entire documents pertaining to his employment, deceased was shown as son of Baz Muhammad, therefore, trial court rightly passed decree.

YLR 2013 1509

Muhammad Saleem v. Sui Southern Gas &,

O.XX, R.5 of CPC Ss.29, 42 & 54 specific Relief Act. Trial Court neither accepted the evidence of either party nor rejected the same, such appeals were accepted and cases were remanded.

YLR 2013 1559

Bibi Rukhsana v. Abdul Malik Khan & others.,

Islamic Law. Pre-emptor on coming to know about suit sale on 17-1-2008 was legally required to have made first Talb on same date and time, but he remained kept quiet till 11-3-2009, therefore, such negligent conduct of pre-emptor was not condonable. Law would favour vigilant and not indolent.

CLC 2013 871

Rehmatullah & others v. Hameedullah & others,

S. 79 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) Ss. 42 & 54 Suit by or against the government or public officers in their official capacity is not maintainable if government is not made party.

PLD 2013 52

Ishaque v. Rasheed & others,

S. 3 of Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005), Ss.265-K & 417 PPC. Civil litigation regarding the subject property was subjudice before the civil court and present criminal proceedings appeared to be an attempt to prevent the civil proceedings.

PLD 2013 6

Coll: of Customs Qta v. Custom Sale Tax & C. Excise,

Ss. 194-C(4) & 196 of Customs Act,1969. Contention on behalf of Collector Customs (appellant) was that jurisdiction of Single Member of Appellate Tribunal to hear an appeal valuing Rs.100,000 and not Rs.500,000. Impugned order was set aside.

PTD 2013 59

Abdul Baqi v. The State,

Art. 40 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Disclosure made by accused followed by the recovery of blood-stained axe at the instance of accused was an admissible piece of evidence within the meaning of Art.40 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984.

PCrLJ 2013 127

Ghulam Mohammad v. The State,

S. 302(b) PPC & Ss. 7, 17, 20 & 24(2) Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. Legally, it was the 'charge' that would determine the forum of appeal.

PCrLJ 2013 105